Back
Grouping wind, solar, and batteries together can already be more affordable than building a coal or gas plant in prime locations, new report finds.
One of the biggest knocks against renewables — their intermittency — could soon be defanged.
‍
As technology prices fall and industry prowess compounds, a new type of clean megaproject is starting to look not only possible but also economically attractive. These projects would load up the sunniest and windiest places on Earth with enough solar panels, wind turbines, and batteries to deliver ​“firm power” 24 hours a day.
Such firm renewable projects could already compete with the cost of building a new coal- or gas-fired power plant in many regions, according to a new report from the International Renewable Energy Agency. It may sound fanciful to American ears, but projects resembling what IRENA describes are already getting built elsewhere in the world.
Wind and solar have for years competed extremely well on the basic cost per unit of generation, often calculated as the levelized cost of energy; they can generate electricity cheaper than anything that must burn fuel. Last year, onshore wind and fixed-axis solar tied for the lowest levelized cost, at around $40 per megawatt-hour globally, per BloombergNEF, compared with $100 per megawatt-hour for new combined-cycle gas plants.
But that energy cost metric doesn’t tell the full story, because solar and wind famously can’t generate electricity all the time. Utilities and grid operators have to pay extra for firm energy that can fill the gaps between renewable production and demand — and usually that comes from fossil-fueled power plants.
This dynamic has limited the transformational potential of cheap renewables so far. California, for example, floods the wires with cheap solar at noon, but even with its massive fleet of lithium-ion batteries, it still needs gas power plants to keep the system running through the night.
Breakthrough technologies could someday solve the problem of cost-effective, around-the-clock clean power. While enhanced geothermal is making progress, batteries that run for days on end and nuclear fusion are further off. But in the meantime, lithium-ion batteries, which tend to run for just four or five hours at a time, continue to get cheaper and better — making it conceivable to firm up renewables by overbuilding them alongside stacks of conventional energy storage.
IRENA’s report, then, asks how far you can push the clean energy technologies that are available right now.
To answer that, the analysts tapped their database of global renewable project costs and geographical profiles of solar and wind resources ​“to assess what it actually costs to deliver firm, round-the-clock electricity from a hybrid renewable system at a given site, under realistic technology and financing assumptions.”
The results IRENA found are startling: ​“In high-quality resource regions, firm renewable electricity has crossed the threshold of cost competitiveness with new fossil fuel generation,” the authors write. ​“The central question is no longer whether firm renewables can compete on cost, but how quickly the structural conditions needed to realise their potential can be put in place across the diversity of markets and institutional contexts prevailing globally.”
China sets the bar with its shockingly low cost of firm renewables today.
IRENA looked at 252 solar projects that went online there in 2024 and found that many of them could be augmented with extra solar capacity and batteries to deliver power cheaper than the $100-per-megawatt-hour benchmark for new gas-fired plants. Almost all the modeled solar-battery plants could beat that cost for firm clean power 90% of the time; even at the higher reliability threshold of 99%, nearly half the projects remained competitive, and the lowest cost was $46 per megawatt-hour.
‍
.svg)
