CORRECTION: The owners of the Three Mile Island nuclear plant are seeking a $1.6 billion loan guarantee; an item in yesterday’s newsletter listed the wrong amount.
EMISSIONS: Global natural gas exports are responsible for far more emissions than coal exports, researchers find, concluding there is “no need for LNG as an interim energy source” as countries phase out coal. (The Guardian)
COAL:
NUCLEAR: Regulators and lawmakers should do more to make nuclear reactor licensing more accessible and craft regulations that allow existing reactors to support data centers and hydrogen producers, panelists say during a clean energy conference. (Utility Dive)
EQUITY: A solar technician training course in Boston aims to build a more diverse workforce to accelerate the rate of solar installations and help residents of underserved communities. (WBUR)
POLITICS:
OIL & GAS: ConocoPhillips signs a $300 million deal to acquire some of Chevron’s oil and gas facilities on Alaska’s North Slope, bucking the trend of large companies selling out to private firms. (Alaska Beacon)
CARBON CAPTURE: The U.S. Interior Department is two years behind in crafting rules for offshore carbon sequestration, but expects to finish this year. (E&E News)
HYDROGEN: The U.S. Treasury Department will finalize its clean hydrogen tax credit rules by the end of the year, a deputy secretary says. (Heatmap)
This article was originally published by the New Jersey Monitor.
After a scorching summer that saw electricity bills soar, experts told lawmakers Wednesday that they should eschew costly utility mandates, invest in technology like carbon capture, and avoid shutting down power plants before replacement power sources are up and running.
Wednesday’s hearing of the Assembly’s utilities committee was called to address complaints from South Jersey residents about dramatic electric bill spikes, and it came in the midst of New Jersey’s push for broader electrification that could push power demand yet higher.
Jason Stanek, executive director of government services for PJM Interconnection, the grid operator for New Jersey and 12 other states, said New Jersey should not advance policies that shut down power sources unless they have replacements that are operating.
The state’s last two coal-fired power plants closed in 2022, and wind projects meant to boost its generation capacity have faced cost and other hurdles.
“To minimize rate impacts, we would respectfully request avoiding any policies that are designed to push resources off the system before we have an equal and equivalent amount of replacement resources,” Stanek said.
Swings in energy supply and demand can put pressure on rates, especially when supply falls as demand rises.
Stanek noted electricity prices at its annual July capacity auction surged nearly nine times higher than the previous year. Utilities procure electricity through the auction and sell it to ratepayers at cost but can generate a profit from transmission, among other things.
Rate Counsel Brian Lipman said the higher auction prices would add between $12 and $15 to customers’ monthly electricity bills beginning in June.
Improvements to energy efficiency had helped tamp down on demand for more electricity generation in recent decades, though that trend has since reversed, Board of Public Utilities President Christine Guhl-Sadovy told the committee.
Growing electrification, increased uptake in electric vehicles and their charges, and surging demand for data centers spurred by a boom in artificial intelligence are set to push New Jersey’s energy needs up significantly, said Assemblyman Wayne DeAngelo (D-Mercer), the committee’s chairman.
“If you have a quick charging station, they use 100 amps. That’s the amount of power that’s in a small residential house,” said DeAngelo, an electrician by trade. “As we’re moving New Jersey across and increasing our bandwidth and the need for data — be mindful as AI is coming into the picture and becoming more prominent — one data center that they’re talking about building is going to need 800 (megawatts).”
That data center alone would consume nearly a quarter of the electricity produced by three nuclear power plants in South Jersey that, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, accounted for 43.5% of the state’s energy generation in 2022. Combined, the plants produce 3,457 megawatts of electricity.
Some suggested New Jersey’s ambitious renewable energy goals, which call for the state to draw 100% of its power from renewable sources by 2035, wouldn’t help the state meet electricity demand in the short run.
“We need to be moving towards that clean energy future, but we also need to be investing in some of the technologies of where we are today. There are technologies that can help out the use of natural gas, like carbon capture,” said Rich Henning, president and CEO of the New Jersey Utility Association.
Others suggested regulatory changes would push power prices down.
Lipman, the rate counsel, said changes to federal rules that would include more electric capacity in PJM auctions would push down rates, and he urged an end to legislative mandates that forced utilities to invest in infrastructure or raise other costs passed along to ratepayers, like a $300 million annual subsidy to the state’s nuclear plants that is due to lapse on June 1.
In New Jersey, most utilities can earn 9.6 cents for every dollar invested in addition to recouping their expenses. Those costs are typically borne by ratepayers.
“We’re forcing them to invest, and they’re not doing that for free. They’re coming back and they’re seeking their money,” Lipman said, adding new oversight of transmission could also control costs.
NUCLEAR: The owners of Pennsylvania’s Three Mile Island nuclear plant are seeking a $1.6 billion, taxpayer-backed federal loan guarantee to help finance its plans to restart and sell electricity to Microsoft. (Washington Post)
ALSO: The Three Mile Island plant will need extensive and rigorous safety inspections if it is to come online again to provide power. (Scientific American)
WIND:
GRID: PJM Interconnection refuses to let power generators add battery storage to facilities that have surplus grid capacity, confounding clean energy advocates. (Canary Media)
NATURAL GAS: A proposal to build a natural gas power plant in Newark, New Jersey – the fourth in the same neighborhood – faces intense local opposition from residents who say the plan runs counter to the state’s renewable energy goals. (NJ Spotlight News)
OIL & GAS: A Pennsylvania Republican introduces a bill that would sell state alternative energy credits and use the funds to cap abandoned oil and gas wells. (Pennsylvania Business Report)
SOLAR:
ELECTRIC VEHICLES: Electric vehicle ownership in Connecticut is concentrated in wealthy Fairfield County, raising questions about how the state can better encourage more widespread adoption. (CT Post)
TRANSPORTATION: Vermont is holding public meetings as part of its investigation into the possibility of using a cap-and-invest strategy to lower emissions from transportation in the state. (WCAX)
BUILDINGS: A 17-story Boston office building is the first commercial project to use cement made by a Massachusetts company with technology to significantly reduce emissions during the production process. (CommonWealth Beacon)
CLARIFICATION: A Pennsylvania solar bill would not require developers to pay up front for future costs of removing panels. An item in yesterday’s newsletter mischaracterized the bill.
GRID: The U.S. Energy Department will release a massive transmission study today that maps how the grid can be expanded to make way for more clean energy and shored up to withstand increasingly dangerous storms. (E&E News)
ALSO:
SOLAR: The U.S. Commerce Department says it will raise tariffs on solar imports from four southeast Asian countries, though it’s still determining how much those imports affect domestic manufacturing and how much to charge. (Utility Dive)
NUCLEAR: The owners of Pennsylvania’s Three Mile Island nuclear plant are seeking a $1.6 billion, taxpayer-backed federal loan guarantee to help finance plans to restart its reactor and sell electricity to Microsoft. (Washington Post)
MINING: Companies running quartz mines in a small North Carolina town say they’re trying to restart operations, but say Helene’s damages to the mines and employees’ homes may hold them up, further stalling production of a critical semiconductor component. (CNN)
CARBON CAPTURE: A recent leak discovered at an Illinois carbon capture and storage well, and the lack of communication about the incident to the public, raises concerns from advocates about whether the technology is ready to be scaled up. (Inside Climate News)
ELECTRIC VEHICLES:
HYDROPOWER: A contractor completes the removal of four hydroelectric dams on the lower Klamath River in California and Oregon, giving fish free run of the stream for the first time in over a century. (Hydro Review)
A newly published study examining property values near dozens of large Midwest solar farms has found no significant negative impact — and even a slight positive effect — from the projects, according to the data.
Loyola University researcher Gilbert Michaud has attended scores of community meetings about proposed solar projects across the Midwest. In past research, he quantified that property values were the most common concern brought up in local hearings about proposed utility-scale solar.
And while solar arrays may have an aesthetic impact, property values are influenced by a wide range of other factors, such as the quality of schools and the local economy.
“I’ve observed a lot of the negative comments framed as ‘I think’ or ‘I saw something on social media,’” said Michaud, an assistant professor of environmental policy at the School of Environmental Sustainability at Loyola University Chicago. So he sought to “elevate the discussion from ‘I think, I think, I think,’” by injecting it with some hard data.
His latest study, published in the December 2024 issue of the journal Solar Compass, looked at property values surrounding 70 utility-scale solar projects in the Midwest and found they actually had a minor positive effect — increasing values 0.5% to 2%.
“While the impact itself — of a few thousand dollars — might not be incredibly meaningful,” said Michaud, “clearly these projects drive economic development in rural communities, through jobs, tax contributions, etcetera, which in turn increase residential property values.”
Michael Wildermuth, a landowner in Allen County, Ohio, was glad to hear about the proposed 300 MW Birch Solar farm, since he supports clean energy and welcomed the economic benefits. Wildermuth cofounded an organization, Allen Auglaize Coalition for Reasonable Energy (named for the two counties where the project would be sited), to advocate for the project as it faced local opposition.
“The nearest neighbors became enraged so quickly and voiced their rage so loudly that others were placed in a reactionary mode,” Wildermuth said. “The neighbors were greatly concerned with property values and flooding. The landowners were afraid of these vocal neighbors, the public officials were afraid of being on the wrong side of a political ‘hot potato’ issue.”
The developer appealed to the Ohio State Supreme Court, and Allen Auglaize Coalition for Reasonable Energy filed an amicus brief in support of the solar farm. Wildermuth wishes more data about property values had been available during the debate. He also thinks opponents ignored the $81 million the developer estimated it would contribute to the economy, with local officials saying the project would have little local economic benefit since the power would go to an Amazon facility.
“Just get people ‘all het up’ and you don’t have to deal with reason and facts,” Wildermuth said.
“Do I think solar farms could actually improve property values or the financial well-being of landowners and neighbors of solar farms? Yes, I do. We argued that. We also pointed out that, in the rural area where the farm was planned, the properties would remain stable for 30 years,” preventing them from being developed for other purposes that neighbors may find less desirable.
The study, co-authored by Loyola graduate Sampson Hao, notes that the benefits of rooftop solar on energy bills and property values are well-documented. But less is known about how utility-scale solar farms impact nearby properties — even though utility-scale solar accounts for about three-quarters of new solar development.
The study reviewed 70 solar farms built in the Midwest between 2009 and 2022, from a database by Berkeley Laboratory including solar farms over 5 MW. Hao and Michaud analyzed property values compiled by real estate firm Zillow, comparing values five years before a solar project became operational, with values at the operational date, which is often about two years after construction starts.
They aggregated by zip code, and controlled for factors like the COVID-19 pandemic that could affect housing values in a given year. Three-bedroom houses were used as a measure of overall property values. They also analyzed “control group” zip codes near the solar farm zip codes, but without solar farms, to account for other factors that might affect property values.
Michaud noted that while the number of bedrooms and other factors have a much larger impact on property values, the small positive impact that nearby solar farms could have could be similar to that of cultural amenities, like arts centers. Solar farms can also have an impact on schools — a major factor in determining property values — since solar projects augment local tax bases. Solar developers also often make ongoing contributions to school districts in the form of donations, supplies and energy education opportunities.
The study showed high numbers of solar farms going online in 2017 and 2021, with a smaller spike in 2020.
The projects included in the study range from a 10 MW urban installation in Chicago, installed by Exelon in 2010, to the 268 MW Riverstart Solar Park in Indiana, from 2021. Only 11 of the 70 projects studied were over 100 MW in capacity. Indiana had the most arrays at 22, followed by 14 in Minnesota, eight in Michigan and seven in Illinois.
The most beneficial impact on property values was from solar farms between 5 and 20 MW in size, perhaps in part because these can be hidden by vegetative buffers.
“The paper is not about a house that’s 200 feet away from a solar project, that’s very rarely the case,” said Hao, noting that developers often offer to buy properties at above market value in such situations. “We wanted to look at a bigger scale. A project between 5 and 20 MW, you’re really not supposed to even see these with your bare eyes.”
Michaud said that debunking myths around solar farms is particularly important in the Midwest, where there is much untapped potential for solar. While it has less sun than the Southeast and California, which have led the nation in solar farm development, the Midwest has massive stretches of agricultural land where solar can be deployed along with crops.
“This is a really important finding for Midwestern government officials, land owners, and many others to know about,” Michaud said. “Many of these folks are now making decisions about whether to host a large-scale solar project in their community, and the potential impacts to property values is often something that comes up in local debates and at local hearings. Data can help tell a story and move the debate beyond anecdotal or subjective arguments.”
The Loyola study cites a 2018 analysis of 956 specific solar farms by a University of Texas researcher that found no conclusive evidence of impact on property values one way or another. The Loyola researchers also noted a study by Berkeley Laboratory that found about a 1% decline in property values around 2,000 solar farms in six states on the east and west coasts and in Minnesota.
“Most Midwestern states have 10 to 20 gigawatts of potential utility-scale solar in their queue, and developers are coming off of the coasts where the grid is more congested and there is less land for development, targeting agricultural land in the center of the country,” Michaud said. “Finding a large plot of land with good solar irradiation and access to a substation is the sweet spot for a lot of solar developers, and in essence, positive attributes of farming crops in the Midwest are also positive attributes for farming ground-mounted, large-scale solar.”
The study notes the irony that perception plays a significant role in determining property values, and fears about property value declines can become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
“Projection and speculation drive market forces,” Michaud said. “A farmer might be angry that a solar farm is going in the community, he’s going to sell and move to Florida. A buyer thinks, ‘maybe I can negotiate this price down,’ and the house sells for less than its value, and an appraiser looks at that. But none of this is real, it’s just based on speculation and emotion, which then drives data points … it all started with an emotional response.”
Hao theorized that developers who make poor choices in siting and managing solar farms can have an impact on property values elsewhere, if negative stories about solar spread by word of mouth or social media.
“Is a developer doing their best to have as much of a buffer as economically feasible?” he asked. “Is the developer making vegetative screenings so you’re not going to see millions of panels? Is the developer doing their best to move the inverter to the center of the leased land so noise doesn’t get over the road? There’s a lot of things at the end of the day that developers can do better. It’s up to the developers to really step up their game to eliminate those potential negative effects.”
The Loyola study notes that solar developers often do things like hosting county fairs or supporting local organizations that can increase property values. Michaud said it’s possible such dynamics were reflected in their data showing small increases in property values, along with other benefits.
“From an economic perspective,” Michaud said, “locals should increasingly look at these data to understand the job opportunities, wages paid, new tax revenues and negligible or positive impacts on property values, and realize that large-scale solar projects might actually be an amenity in their community.”
Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated Michael Wildermuth planned to lease land for the Birch solar project, and that he personally filed an amicus brief in the case. The story has also been updated to clarify the scope of Gilbert Michaud’s research.
FINANCE: Private equity firms have invested more than $1 trillion of public sector pension funds into the energy sector since 2010, a new analysis finds, with much of it going to fossil fuel projects that will have big climate impacts and uncertain returns. (The Guardian)
CLEAN ENERGY:
POLITICS:
WIND:
GRID:
SOLAR:
ELECTRIFICATION:
CLEAN ENERGY:
ALSO: Despite ongoing critiques from Sen. JD Vance, the Inflation Reduction Act has benefited Ohio residents, including in his hometown of Middletown, with new clean energy investments. (New York Times)
UTILITIES: Xcel Energy spent more on lobbying state lawmakers than any other organization in Minnesota last year, when lobbying spending ballooned 18% from 2022. (Minnesota Reformer)
RENEWABLES: While wind and solar made up 64% of Iowa’s electricity generation last year, the state needs to speed up efforts to transition from coal to meet climate change targets, a statewide environmental group reports. (Radio Iowa)
GRID:
NUCLEAR: A resolution is near in a yearslong tax dispute over the value of a Michigan nuclear plant, which could result in a roughly $4.3 million cut in tax revenue for local schools and governments next year. (MLive)
SOLAR: A southern Indiana farmer says a proposed 2,050-acre solar project around his land would look like an “industrial wasteland,” while others see an opportunity to generate revenue for their farm. (WHAS)
BIOMASS: The University of Iowa is leaning heavily on various biomass crops for power generation as it continues plans to phase out coal by next year. (Daily Iowan)
CARBON CAPTURE: A carbon capture demonstration project at a large North Dakota coal plant receives a $4.1 million grant as part of hundreds of millions of dollars in federal support expected for the project. (Power Magazine)
OIL & GAS: The Ohio Court of Appeals denies the state attorney general’s request to hear a case seeking to hold a gas pipeline company responsible for discharging millions of gallons of drilling liquids into wetlands. (Bloomberg Law, subscription)
OFFSHORE WIND: In a major milestone, the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management approves New Jersey’s first offshore wind project, though opponents have vowed to keep fighting the development. (Associated Press)
ALSO: Officials in New Bedford, Massachusetts, vote to amend zoning regulations to clear the way for more construction at a marine terminal intended to serve the offshore wind industry. (New Bedford Standard-Times)
ELECTRIFICATION: Massachusetts regulators order National Grid to create a seasonal discounted rate for households with heat pumps, months after approving a similar plan by another utility. (Energy News Network)
SOLAR
NUCLEAR:
CONSUMER PROTECTION: Big energy companies in Maryland argue that a law intended to protect consumers from predatory energy suppliers will limit their ability to market their renewable energy products, hurting their business and slowing the state’s progress toward its climate goals. (Maryland Matters)
ELECTRIC VEHICLES: A Massachusetts startup unveils a new, slow electric vehicle charger in Concord, New Hampshire, testing the idea that the less-expensive equipment can help expand charging infrastructure in places where cars remain parked for several hours. (Concord Monitor)
HYDROGEN: A Massachusetts company claims its equipment can make hydrogen at greater scale, using methods that produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions than the traditional process. (MIT Technology Review)
BUILDINGS:
ELECTRIFICATION: Two of the world’s largest building materials companies invest $75 million in a Massachusetts company that makes cement using an electric current instead of emissions-intensive fossil-fueled kilns. (Canary Media)
The growing solar industry needs more workers equipped to get panels into fields and onto roofs. Meanwhile, disinvested populations — including communities of color and formerly incarcerated people — often lack access to such jobs.
An Illinois program aims to tackle both of those problems at once — and goes beyond a few months of training to ensure workers have everything they need to succeed, Audrey Henderson reports for the Energy News Network.
With funding from community solar developer Cultivate Power, the Chicago-based Renewing Sovereignty Program works with a training partner to provide a 13-week solar installation program for people leaving the criminal justice system. Last year’s cohort of 12 trainees all got jobs in solar and related industries. Jacqueline Williams, who works with a social services organization that administers RSP, said this year’s 18 cohorts are on track for similar results.
RSP’s holistic approach to jobs training is a big reason for that success.
“Anything that you can think of that would prevent someone from being successful in a really intensive 13-week program, we’re going to assess that barrier and we’re going to provide it,” Williams told ENN. That includes housing, food, child care and transportation — and that support continues for a year after trainees graduate.In turn, those newly trained solar workers are helping Illinois meet its ambitious clean energy and climate goals.
Read more about RSP’s solar training success at the Energy News Network.
🐢 Hydrogen’s holdup: Uncertainty surrounding federal tax credit rules has left the clean hydrogen industry stuck in neutral, but experts say the delay is providing much-needed time to figure out the best uses for the fuel. (Canary Media)
🪧 Who’s behind anti-protest laws: Records reveal how fossil fuel lobbyists worked with state lawmakers to craft anti-protest laws that increase penalties for non-violent participants and aim to quiet opposition to fossil fuel infrastructure. (The Guardian)
🚘 City charging deserts: Rideshare drivers are adopting electric vehicles at five times the rate of other drivers but say they’re struggling to find places to charge in major cities. (Axios)
🥵 Heat waves: Advocates sound the alarm over a lack of policies stopping utilities from shutting off customers’ power for nonpayment during deadly heat waves. (The Guardian)
👷 Building a clean workforce: The governors of 22 states launch an initiative aimed at getting 1 million residents to complete climate-related apprenticeships by 2035, pledging to set up funding and partnerships to expand the clean energy workforce. (The Hill)
🌡️ Hands-on grid management: Utility customers around the country are signing up for programs to save money in return for allowing power companies to remotely adjust their thermostats to manage grid demand. (Washington Post)
⚛️ Nuclear resurgence: The Energy Department approves a $1.52 billion loan guarantee to restart the closed Palisades nuclear plant in Michigan, part of a resurgence of interest in nuclear power in the U.S. (New York Times)
🇺🇲 Plus, some politics
Environmental advocates are hailing a decision by Massachusetts regulators that will give more than 1.3 million households access to lower winter electricity prices if they use a heat pump in their home.
Public utilities regulators on Monday ordered National Grid, the state’s second-largest electric company, to develop a lower, seasonal rate for houses with heat pumps. The decision comes three months after the state approved a similar rate plan by Unitil, an electric utility that serves 108,500 Massachusetts households.
“They hit the nail on the head here,” said Kyle Murray, Massachusetts program director for climate and energy nonprofit Acadia Center.
Heat pumps are a major element of Massachusetts’ strategy for going carbon neutral by 2050. However, high electricity prices and historically low natural gas prices make switching to a heat pump financially difficult for many people. Unitil’s pricing plan is an attempt to bridge that affordability gap and make heat pumps more accessible, said spokesman Alec O’Meara.
National Grid had proposed a technology-neutral “electrification rate” that would have offered a discounted rate to high-volume electric consumers, whether the power demand was coming from an efficient heat pump, inefficient electric resistance heat, or even a pool heater. Environmental activists, advocates for low-income households, a solar industry group, the state energy department, and the state attorney general all filed comments objecting to this approach and pushing for a heat pump-specific rate like Unitil’s.
“The proposal that National Grid had filed wasn’t going to do anything to ensure that customers who opted into their electrification rate were actually participating in our decarbonization efforts,” said Priya Gandbhir, a senior attorney with the Conservation Law Foundation, one of the groups that pushed for a heat pump specific rate.
In their order, regulators sided with the objectors. They concluded that National Grid’s proposal did not meet the state’s legal mandates to consider the impact of rate design changes on greenhouse gas emissions and energy efficiency, as opposed to Unitil’s approach, which removes a barrier to lower emissions and greater efficiency.
“The heat pump rate will reduce kilowatt hour electricity rates for these customers during winter when heat pumps replace fossil fuel heating equipment, furthering the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions,” said Alanna Kelly, spokesperson for the state department of public utilities.
The order also encouraged National Grid to create the rate quickly so it could be in effect before the coming winter heating season.